Victory for votes: Annie Kenney’s history-making role

Daily Issues2

IT’S EXACTLY 100 years ago this week that women were finally granted the vote.

On February 6, 1918, The Representation of the People Act passed into law giving the vote to all men over the age of 21 – and to certain women over the age of 30.

Those women also had to meet a property qualification so it would actually be another decade before all women got an equal vote.

Nonetheless 1918 was a political earthquake and historians still debate what won the day.

There were many factors involved including years of suffragette campaigning – both constitutional and militant – plus the need to extend the vote to soldiers after World War One, the pressure to recognise women’s war work, and the exit of figureheads opposed to female suffrage from the political stage.

It’s a common misconception that Britain was somehow an early adopter of votes for women. New Zealand did it first back in 1893 and seven more nations had followed suit before we finally caught up with the times.

Local women played a significant role in making this victory happen, not least Springhead’s Annie Kenney, Chadderton’s Lydia Becker and Werneth’s Marjory Lees (pictured above, left to right).

AKSIGNKenney was born in 1879 as the fourth daughter of 12 children and started work at a mill in Lees Brook in Lees at the age of just 10. She was employed there as a “tenter”, spending 15 years fitting bobbins and fixing broken strands of fleece. During that time she also lost one of her fingers, which was ripped off by a bobbin.

Determined to better herself, Annie self-studied and began taking part in trade union activity before getting involved in the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) in around 1905.

In October that year she made national headlines after attending a Liberal meeting at Manchester’s Free Trade Hall with Christabel Pankhurst.

Annie had the temerity to ask Winston Churchill and Sir Edward Grey if they believed woman should have the right to vote. Neither would answer. The pair were then ejected from the meeting after unfurling a ‘Votes for Women’ banner. Outside they were arrested for causing an obstruction and a technical assault on a police officer.

Kenney served three days behind bars on that occasion – becoming the first to be jailed for direct action – and this was to be one of 13 spells for her in prison.

Some may look back and say that suffragette violence against property was unnecessary and put many off their cause, but it’s also too simplistic to overlook the level of state violence these women faced.

Rough-handling by police was commonplace, imprisonment was frequent, and there can be few more brutal acts than physically holding someone down whilst force feeding them against their will to end a hunger strike.

Annie Kenney wasn’t the only local suffragette, of course – there were many others – but what was special about her was her roots and influence.

She’s widely acknowledged as the only working class woman to have reached the top of the WSPU (she was deputy by 1912) and there remains a feeling that, compared with the Pankhursts and others, her contribution still isn’t fully recognised.

Oldham Council did install a blue plaque at Leesbrook Mill acknowledging her contribution many years ago and we recently cleaned it.  Unfortunately that did not make it look much better so it is being repainted as soon as possible.

This centenary is an ideal moment to ensure we preserve the memories of Annie Kenney’s struggle for future generations, so please visit the website here to learn more about the local efforts to erect a statue of Annie Kenney in Parliament Square.

hatecrimeBack to 2018 and the battle against injustice still continues in many other ways…

This week Oldham Council is supporting workshops, information stalls and activities as part of Greater Manchester’s Hate Crime Awareness Week.

Latest Home Office statistics show that hate crimes nationally went up 29 per cent to 80,393 offences in 2016-17: yet even that doesn’t give us the full picture because so much of it goes unreported.

As an Oldham resident you should not suffer a hate crime in silence. If you’re attacked because of your difference – your religion, sexuality, colour of your skin or disability – then you should report it.

By speaking out you can help send the message that hate has no place in modern society and that perpetrators will feel the full force of the law.

A full programme of what is taking place in each part of the borough until February 9 is here. For more information on hate crime you can also visit or call the Victim Support Services helpline on 0161 200 1950.

Prejudice, it seems, is always with us – and that’s why we must never stop fighting it.


General Election: Back to pounding the pavements…

PollingStationI’D ONLY just started writing this blog on Tuesday when I was informed that the Prime Minister was about to make an announcement.

There’s nothing unusual in that, but it’s not often that the PM addresses the country from the steps of Downing Street and predictions that this was going to be a significant development proved to be spot on.

As you will probably know, Parliament has now voted today to approve that a General Election will be held on Thursday, June 8.

This means that we will very quickly enter into a period known traditionally as ‘Purdah’ which enforces strict rules about publicity that must – rightly – be adhered to until after election day.

The timing of this all kicking in remains uncertain, but it means you will hear less formally from me in my role as Oldham Council Leader and this could be the last blog from me until after the votes have all been counted.

Although the timing of Theresa May’s announcement was somewhat unexpected, there had been speculation that it was in the offing for some time.

For political activists it all means full steam ahead for another round of pounding pavements, heavy wear on the shoe leather and lengthy day and night time door knocking.

My work as Council Leader will continue daily during this time but I will also genuinely enjoy the face to face engagement and the chance to discuss residents’ views about the issues affecting their lives in Oldham.

Until that General Election timetable is confirmed it’s very much business as usual, so I wanted to highlight that until April 30 we are taking part in and promoting national Adoption Fortnight.

Each year this campaign has a different focus and this time it is all about encouraging Oldham parents to come forward and create a “forever family” by adopting children from harder to place backgrounds.

These are older children, sibling groups, those from mixed heritage backgrounds and children with additional needs who typically wait much longer for adoption.

It is a huge decision to take to adopt but it can make such a massive and positive impact, not just to the child concerned, but also to the benefit of you and your family.

There are still a lot of myths and misconceptions about adoption – and particularly around who is eligible to do it – so it’s always best to get in touch with experts and people who have been through the process to learn all about the pros and cons.

You can find out more about adopting in Oldham on our website here and you can also get information about Adoption Fortnight events in the region at

BOOMKARKSFinally, as mentioned last week, I just wanted to give you a quick reminder that our amazing Bookmark Festival starts on Friday.  You can have a look at all the events on offer – and book tickets – by visiting

And if it turns out that you don’t hear from me now until after the General Election then all I would ask is that you please take the time to get out and use your vote on June 8 – and in the GM Mayoral Election on May 4 . It’s the only way to ensure that your voice is heard.


Votes at 16

Election - Young Voter Casts Ballot
Should 16-year-olds be given the right to vote?

Oldham Youth Council has set the ‘cat among the pigeons’, or at the very least focused minds with their latest motion to be heard at council this week.

Should 16-year-olds be given the right to vote?

I must admit to being split on the issue. The motion has forced me to research and think through the arguments for and against, ahead of the meeting. That said I could do what many in politics do, which is to either vote ‘yes’ because the campaign ‘for’ is far more advanced than any ‘no’ campaign on the subject – and as such its more popular among those who are vocal on the subject – or I could just vote ‘yes’ because it’s a fashionable thing to support.

The matter should be taken seriously because in many ways it poses a wider question about inclusion and how we get more people to see the importance of voting – and to understand the consequences and benefits.

With turn out at the last local elections at 33 per cent the majority were at home in a sit down protest, or more likely indifferent. The national parliamentary elections faired far better at 61 per cent.

For most people who are not interested in politics the day can pass by unnoticed. Even those who have put their cross in their chosen box in the past feel their individual vote wouldn’t make a difference.

In Parliament, and even in local councils, it is far too easy to be sucked into a very narrow way of thinking and making sure you continue to see the bigger picture is a skill in itself. We are surrounded by either professionals paid to ‘manage’ the decision making process or ‘people like us’, you know political geeks, who love the intrigue and debate on any given subject. I expect most ‘normal’ people are somewhere in between.

Thankfully, the residents of Oldham aren’t shy in coming forward with ideas, suggestions and when needed a harsh reminder now and again that any democratic chamber should be a representation of the people it serves.

We just need to make sure we sit up and take note and not simply dismiss out of hand the real concerns and issues people raise – or try to explain them away.

There is a real case for a more fundamental redesign of our democratic structure, which will meet with cheerleaders and objectors.

Should we have term limits? To stop being a politician becoming a lifestyle or career choice should we be restricted to serving a maximum of say two or three four years terms?

Well that’s me gone within months of my 10 year anniversary as a councillor… turkeys don’t vote for Christmas…

Should we have all out local elections every four years? People could affect real change very swiftly, and four years should be enough for any administration to prove its worth – it could save money too.

Should Parliament be modernised to become more representative of society as a whole? I’m pretty sure most of the UK doesn’t look like Parliament – unless of course we are a secret nation of Oxford and Cambridge political animals, or those who through wealth and opportunity have been positioned in life, almost ‘born to rule’. It appears the system certainly encourages that.

And how should votes be counted? First past the post is clean and easy to understand, but you clearly don’t get a Parliament which reflects ‘voter intention’ or the share of the vote each party gets.

Should there be a financial limit on donations? The Tories claim the trade unions buy Labour votes – I should say most trade unions members would say they don’t get listened to at all. The large donations to the Tories have led to questions about whether  big business is getting tax and policy advantages from the current government.

In my opinion you couldn’t do that without seriously looking at the cost of elections. Making contact with every voter isn’t easy or cheap.

Should we introduce compulsory voting? That’s easy for me – YES – allow people more ways to vote such as online voting and give the ‘none of the above option’. There are then few excuses not to take part.

So failing any agreement on structural changes which really would challenge the status quo and reading the arguments for and against votes for 16-year-olds, I’m left thinking ‘why not?’

I’d like to think turnout would rocket, but I’m not convinced it would if done in isolation. That isn’t to say all the arguments ‘for’ really hold water – you can’t, for instance, buy alcohol or gamble at 16 so pointing to things you ‘can’ do at 16 isn’t a balanced argument.

I am though of the opinion that if schools and colleges do enough to educate young people, and continue to support the work of youth councils and the youth parliament, then changing the system so there isn’t a 2 year gap before people are given the opportunity to vote in other elections makes sense.

It also makes sense that if people are affected by decisions being taken on their behalf then they should have a say over who makes those decisions.

I might just make one plea to the voters of tomorrow – if you do go and vote tell your parents why you voted. It may even inspire the 39 to 77 per cent of over 18s who don’t vote in elections in Oldham to go out and exercise their democratic right.

We are modernising the council and democracy in Oldham – 400 plus viewers watching our council meetings is more than I ever thought was possible. Our Youth Council is one of the best – if not the best in the UK – and the very fact that they have raised this issue and have the power to raise the debate and mandate a vote is testament to how far we’ve come in Oldham.

Eric Pickles – this is democracy in action. Feel free to tune in!